A.B. v. Aviva General Insurance (19-005231)

The claimant sought ongoing IRBs in the amount of $385. The adjudicator found that the claimant was not entitled to IRBs because the claimant failed to provide evidence from the employer or himself regarding his employment (other than differing self-reports to various assessors), and failed to provide sufficient medical evidence that he suffered a substantial inability to complete his essential employment tasks. Because the claimant could not prove that he met the pre-104 week test, he was not entitled to claim post-104 week IRBs.