The insurer sought reconsideration of the Tribunal’s decision to award ACBs beyond the 104 week mark despite the claimant not being designated catastrophically impaired, and the decision to deem the attendant care services incurred. Adjudicator Boyce granted the reconsideration. He held that the Tribunal made a significant error of law in awarding ACBs beyond the 104 week date, and that the claimant’s entitlement ended as of the 104 week date. Further, the adjudicator held that the Tribunal’s decision to deem the attendant care services “incurred” was a significant error in law because the Tribunal had not made any findings that the insurer unreasonably withheld or delayed the payment of ACBs.
Menu