The claimant disputed the MIG determination and entitlement to chiropractic treatment outside of the MIG. The claimant argued that he had pain in his neck, back, and shoulder, as well as psychological symptoms that justified removal from and treatment beyond the MIG. Vice Chair Boyce dismissed the application. The physical injuries identified in the OCF-3 and medical records were soft-tissue injuries that clearly fell within the definition of a minor injury under section 3(1). Further, the claimant had not been diagnosed with a psychological impairment or been prescribed medication for his psychological complaints. As the MIG limits had been exhausted, Vice Chair Boyce did not consider whether the treatment plans in dispute were reasonable and necessary.
Menu