The claimant applied to the LAT seeking entitlement to various benefits after being involved in a motor vehicle accident, including catastrophic determination assessments. Vice-Chair Ciriello concluded that none of the disputed treatment plans or assessments were payable due to a lack of supporting evidence, articulating that treatment plans alone do not prove that the proposed treated is reasonable and necessary. There must be corroborating contemporaneous and objective medical evidence put before the tribunal to substantiate the necessity and reasonableness of any proposed treatment.
Menu