The claimant disputed his MIG determination and sought entitlement to a number of treatment plans for physical and psychological treatment. The claimant submitted no clinical notes and records, and there was no evidence to support that he was ever seen by a medical doctor for his accident-related impairments. Given the lack of evidence to demonstrate that the claimant was unable to recover within the MIG, Adjudicator Grant concluded that the claimant had failed to meet his onus of establishing entitlement to treatment outside of the MIG limits.
