The claimant sought interest on re-instated IRBs and entitlement to an orthopaedic mattress. The insurer opposed paying interest, arguing that the claimant had not provided evidence earlier in her claim supporting IRB entitlement. Adjudicator Maedel held that once the insurer re-instated IRBs, the claimant was entitled to interest for the period IRBs had not been paid. He rejected the claim for a mattress because the claimant had not provided any explanation how the mattress related to her specific injuries, and had not provided the Tribunal with the treatment plan itself.
