Applicant v. Aviva Insurance Canada (17-003597)

The claimant sought entitlement to medical benefits outside of the MIG, costs of a psychological examination, a special award, and interest. On the basis of the evidence presented by both parties, Adjudicator Hans held that the claimant’s injuries fell within the MIG. The claimant also failed to prove that an earlier motor vehicle accidents and a workplace injury constituted pre-existing conditions that should remove the claimant from the MIG. Adjudicator Hans further concluded that neither a special award nor interest were not warranted.