The claimant had suffered a catastrophic impairment in the accident and sought entitlement to rehabilitation benefits from an OT. The insurer denied the services on the basis of IEs that had concluded that the claimant had recovered from a physical perspective. Adjudicator Mather awarded the claimed benefits, and held that the claimant continued to suffer psychological impairments that necessitated further intervention with an occupational therapist. The adjudicator also wrote that surveillance provided by the insurer was of no assistance as it did not provide evidence that further occupational therapy was not required from a psychological perspective.