Applicant v. RBC General Insurance (17-005218)

The claimant sought medical benefits for a psychological assessment and psychological treatment and interest. The insurer maintained that the claimant’s injuries fell within the MIG and the disputed medical benefits were not payable. Adjudicator Sharma concluded that the claimant’s injuries fell within the MIG and dismissed the claimant’s application. Adjudicator Sharma preferred the evidence of the IE assessor to that of the s. 25 assessor. Adjudicator Sharma attached little weight to Dr. Pilowsky’s s. 25 psychological assessment, concluding that it was not credible.