The insurer sought reconsideration of the Tribunal’s decision that the denial letter for a psychological assessment was deficient and that the insurer was barred from applying the MIG; the assessment was also found reasonable and necessary. Vice Chair Lester dismissed the reconsideration. She held that the Tribunal had not violated the rules of procedural fairness or natural justice. She also held that the Tribunal had not made a significant error of law or fact such that a different result would have been reached.
