The insurer sought reconsideration of the Tribunal’s award of ongoing NEBs. The Tribunal had found that despite the claimant’s ability to participate in most of her pre-accident activities, the claimant was so restricted that she could not be seen as engaging in those activities. The insurer argued that the Tribunal had failed to consider relevant evidence in coming to its conclusion and requested an order setting aside the decision. Executive Chair Lamoureux rejected the insurer’s request for reconsideration. She held that the Tribunal’s findings of fact supported the award of NEBs, and that it would be inappropriate for her to reweigh the evidence.
