G.S. v. Aviva General Insurance Company (17-004847)

The insurer sought reconsideration of the Tribunal’s decision that the claimant’s injuries fell outside of the MIG due to chronic pain. Vice Chair Mather dismissed the reconsideration and held that the Tribunal had not made a significant error in law and had not violated the rules of natural justice. The Tribunal had considered the medical evidence, which supported the legal conclusions. The Tribunal’s reasons addressed the parties’ arguments, and made clear why the claimant was removed from the MIG.