The claimant brought a request for reconsideration of a motion order of the LAT dated December 5, 2022 (the “order”), where the LAT denied the claimant’s request for an extension to file a request for reconsideration of a previous LAT decision dated August 11, 2022. The claimant’s request for reconsideration was dismissed for multiple reasons. The LAT found that the claimant’s request for reconsideration was non-compliant with Rule 18.1 of the Licence Appeal Tribunal, Animal Care Review Board, and Fire Safety Commission Common Rules of Practice and Procedure, Version I (October 2, 2017), as amended (“Rules”), since the order did not constitute a final determination of a substantive matter in dispute between the claimant and the insurer. The LAT further found that the adjudicator had not made an error of law or fact in the order. The LAT found that the claimant’s complaint that the LAT had granted the respondent’s request to strike paragraphs in her written reply motion submissions did not involve an error of law or fact on the part of the LAT.
