The claimant applied to the LAT seeking entitlement to a variety of assessments and chiropractic treatment. Adjudicator Maleki-Yazdi found that three assessments and one of three treatment plans proposing chiropractic treatment were reasonable and necessary. The denied treatment plans were considered to be duplicative treatment. An attendant care assessment was found to be reasonable and necessary for the claimant who testified to having activity limitations and requiring work-related modifications as a result of the accident. The denied portion of a partially approved psychological assessment was found to be payable.
