The claimant sought entitlement to IRBs, housekeeping expenses, and various medical benefits. The insurer argued that the application was barred by the limitation period. Vice Chair McGee held that the insurer’s denials were clear and unequivocal, regardless of whether they were correct to deny the benefits. With regard to section 7 of the LAT Act, Vice Chair McGee held that she did not have the authority to extend the limitation period. She also noted that some of the disputed benefits were applied for almost 10 years after the initial denials.
