M.C. v. Aviva General Insurance Company (18-006840)

The claimant sought entitlement to NEBs, psychological services, and a psychological assessment. Adjudicator Watt found that the claimant had not proven that he met the requirements to qualify for NEBs, in light of evidence that the claimant had minimal physical functional impairment and the claimant’s own evidence under oath that he was able to perform all self-care tasks and had no functional limitations from the accident. Adjudicator Watt did not find psychological services and a psychological assessment reasonable or necessary since the claimant admitted in examination under oath that he was not claiming any psychological issues as a result of the accident.