M.M. v. Aviva General Insurance (19-002201)

The claimant sought entitlement to IRBs and three medical benefits. Adjudicator Chakravarti held that the claimant was not entitled to any of the claimed benefits. She found that the claimant was not credible, and that insufficient evidence was put forward to show that the claimant was working or had worked 26 of the past 52 weeks prior to the accident. The purported employer said that documents with his company name on the letterhead were misrepresentations. The claimant also failed to put forward convincing evidence regarding the three claimed medical benefits.