The claimant sought non-earner benefits. An Tribunal Order of June 24, 2019, determined that the issues in dispute were NEBs and interest on overdue payments. In the claimant’s submissions, she included 2 additional issues: (1) status under the MIG and (2) a medical rehabilitation benefit. The claimant provided physiotherapy records, which included only one page of an initial assessment dated in November 2016, a treatment session note as well as a treatment plan and an OCF-3 all dated in November 2016, which did not note any impairments resulting from the accident Adjudicator Chakravarti concluded that the claimant had not shown evidence that she sustained an impairment as a result of the accident, let alone to prove she suffered a complete inability to carry on a normal life. The applicant was found not entitled to NEBs.
Menu