The claimant sought entitlement to IRBs, removal from the MIG, and entitlement to various medical benefits. Adjudicator Mazerolle found that the claimant’s linger pain did not meet the definition of chronic pain because there was little indication of changes in her daily activities or reporting to the family physician. He also found that the claimant did not demonstrate an ongoing psychological impairment. The claimant failed to explain why hypertension would prevent maximal recovery under the MIG. The adjudicator also concluded that the claimant did not suffer a substantial inability to perform the essential tasks of her pre-accident employment, and had returned to work with some minor modifications.
Menu