The claimant was involved in an automobile accident in February 2022. She applied to the LAT seeking CAT determination under Criterion 8 and entitlement to IRBs, ACBs, and numerous medical benefits. The claimant brought a motion to exclude the surveillance evidence because the respondent did not comply with the case conference order to disclose the investigator’s handwritten notes, the surveillance agreement between the respondent and the investigation company, all communications between the investigator and the respondent, invoices, and unredacted adjuster log notes that relate to surveillance. The LAT found that the surveillance evidence was admissible because of the probative nature of the evidence. The LAT found that the claimant was not CAT and not entitled to the majority of the issues in dispute.
