P.I. v. Aviva Insurance Canada (16-001320)

The claimant sought reconsideration of a Tribunal decision which upheld a MIG determination. The claimant asserted the Tribunal violated the rules of natural justice and erred in law when it failed to consider psychological, physical, and pre-existing medical evidence. Executive Chair Linda Lamoureux determined that it is open for a Tribunal adjudicator to prefer one party’s evidence above another’s and that the claimant’s assertion regarding a violation of natural justice was “entirely without foundation.” The claimant’s appeal was dismissed.