Y.Y. v. Unica Insurance Inc. (16-000552)

The claimant sought entitlement to attendant care benefits. Adjudicator Theoharis did not find the account of the service provider credible as the testimony was vague and did not sound convincing when cross-examined. Additionally, the claimant provided contrary evidence to a statutory declaration. The evidentiary record also contained conflicting accounts as to who provided services, if at all. As a result. Adjudicator Theoharis found that the personal support worker had not provided services and the claim for attendant care benefits was dismissed, under section 3(7)(e)(i).