LAT Case Law Summaries

Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP is pleased to provide this online resource to our clients. Below is a searchable database of the publicly released decisions from the Licence Appeal Tribunal. Assembled by the accident benefits group, the decisions are reviewed, briefly summarized, and categorized for easy access.

As of March 2020, we will not include any further decisions focused solely on the Minor Injury Guideline or treatment plans, unless the case may have broader applicability.

September 30, 2020

/

tgp-admin

K.L. v. Aviva Insurance Company (19-004368)

The sole issue in dispute was whether the claimant was entitled to a special award under Ontario Regulation 664. The insurer initially denied a treatment plan, and referred the claimant to an IE to determine whether the plan was reasonable and necessary. Upon receipt of the IE reports, the insurer wrote to the claimant confirming...

September 29, 2020

/

tgp-admin

Staszewski v. Intact Insurance Company (19-012409)

The claimant applied to the LAT seeking entitlement to pre- and post-104 IRBs. Three medicolegal reports noted the claimant had returned to work in some capacity since the accident. The insurer suspended the claimant's entitlement to IRBs pursuant to section 33 of the SABS for failure to provide documentation regarding post-accident employment and income. The...

September 28, 2020

/

tgp-admin

B.M. v. Unica Insurance Inc. (19-009381)

The claimant sought entitlement to two medical benefits for physiotherapy and occupational therapy services. The claimant had a significant pre-accident medical history that included a workplace accident, two separate motor vehicle accidents in 2013, chronic lumbar radiculopathy, and chronic lower back pain. He was also involved in a subsequent motor vehicle accident in 2016 after...

September 28, 2020

/

tgp-admin

P.S. v. Allstate Insurance (18-012633)

The claimant was seriously injured in a 2013 accident and sought a determination that he suffered a catastrophic impairment due to a combined WPI of 55 percent. He also sought entitlement to three treatment plans for further physiotherapy and psychotherapy. The claimant suffered from chronic pain and abused opioids as a result of his injuries....

September 24, 2020

/

tgp-admin

A.J. v. Aviva General Insurance (19-010794)

The claimant disputed entitled to two treatment plans for physiotherapy and chiropractic services. The insurer disputed the claimant's entitlement based upon IE reports, and argued that new evidence was submitted in the claimant's reply submissions were prejudicial. The insurer, by way of motion, requested that the new evidence was improperly submitted and requested it be...

September 24, 2020

/

tgp-admin

Marca v. Aviva Insurance Company (19-004839)

The claimant sought entitlement to NEBs, a medical benefit for physiotherapy services, interest on overdue payment of benefits, and an award. The claimant argued that she had partially resumed some activities post-accident but not at all. The claimant also argued that even though she had returned partially to her personal care, she experienced pain when...

September 23, 2020

/

tgp-admin

M.J. v. Dufferin Mutual Insurance Company (19-006241)

The sole issue in dispute was whether the claimant was entitled to a special award under Ontario Regulation 664. All of the substantive issues, including a claim for income replacement benefits, physiotherapy, and several assessments were resolved in advance of the hearing. Adjudicator Boyce agreed with the claimant on two grounds: (1) denying section 25...

September 23, 2020

/

tgp-admin

A.M. v. Zurich Insurance Company Ltd. (19-009920)

The claimant was being transported by the Ontario Provincial Police in the rear box of a prisoner’s transportation van. During the transport, the van struck a moose and the claimant, handcuffed and shackled, was thrown towards the front of the van, suffering physical and psychological injuries. He applied for and received accident benefits from the...

September 23, 2020

/

tgp-admin

M.E.R v. Aviva General Insurance Company (17-008924)

The claimant applied to the LAT seeking entitlement to ACBs in the amount of $2,479 per month and various medical benefits for physical treatment, psychological treatment, occupational therapy services, an orthopaedic mattress, the cost of clothing and personal expenses, and transportation expenses. The claimant was a pedestrian injured in a motor vehicle accident in a...

September 23, 2020

/

tgp-admin

C.N. v. Aviva General Insurance (19-004405)

The retired claimant sought entitlement to NEB. He argued that the accident had exacerbated a previously asymptomatic right shoulder injury. He claimed due to the accident he suffered neck, right shoulder and lumbar spine pain that affected his ability to engage in his activities of daily living. However, he did not make any submissions on...

September 23, 2020

/

tgp-admin

M.R. v. Allstate Insurance Company of Canada (18-012729)

The claimant was involved in multiple accidents between 1991 and 2003. A preliminary hearing was held in relation to benefits claimed following a September 1996 accident and whether certain disputed benefits were captured by various releases signed by the claimant. The claimant sought entitlement to ACBs, HK expenses, transportation expenses, and home modifications. In addition...

September 22, 2020

/

tgp-admin

Watters v. Aviva Insurance Company (19-005152)

The sole issue in dispute was whether the claimant was entitled to a special award under Ontario Regulation 664. The insurer changed its decision with respect to all of the treatment plans in dispute shortly prior to the hearing. The claimant alleged that the insurer ought to be liable for an award because the decisions...

September 22, 2020

/

tgp-admin

M. R. v Wawanesa Insurance (19-007921)

This is a preliminary decision over the definition of "accident" in the SABS. The claimant was swapping his winter tires to his summer tires when he injured his back. The claimant took the position that this was an "accident" because seasonally changing tires constituted the normal use and operation of a motor vehicle. Adjudicator Flude...

September 22, 2020

/

tgp-admin

C.K.D. v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance (18-006988)

The claimant slipped and fell in the process of getting into his vehicle at a gas station. The insurer argued that the incident did not qualify as an accident. Adjudicator Makhamra concluded that the incident qualified as an accident. The claimant was just next to his driver's door and was reaching out with his left...

September 18, 2020

/

tgp-admin

M.M. v. Aviva Insurance Co. (17-006475)

The claimant requested reconsideration of Adjudicator Boyce's decision in which he determined that the claimant was not entitled to IRBs (among other things). Adjudicator Boyce again reviewed the submissions and evidence before him and upheld his previous decision. The claimant alleged that accepting the surveillance evidence presented by the insurer did not show psychological or...

September 18, 2020

/

tgp-admin

P.M. v. Aviva General Insurance (19-002717)

The claimant sought removal from the MIG and entitlement to medical benefits for physiotherapy, massage therapy as well as the cost of psychological and physiatry assessments, and completion of an OCF-3. The claimant also sought a special award. Adjudicator Lake found the claimant's injuries were outside of the MIG due to her chronic pain, but...

September 18, 2020

/

tgp-admin

P.B. v. The Co-operators Insurance Company (19-008343)

The claimant was receiving IRBs of $400 per week. She settled her action against her LTD provider. The LTD release indicated that it covered all claims being made against the LTD provider, including punitive damages and costs. The insurer argued that it was entitled to deduct from IRBs the amounts received from the LTD settlement....

September 17, 2020

/

tgp-admin

N.S. v TD General Insurance Company (19-002494)

The claimant applied to the LAT disputing entitlement to various treatment plans and interest. The claim was outside the MIG, so Adjudicator Norris had to determine whether the treatment plans were reasonable and necessary. Adjudicator Norris found that the physical therapy and OT treatment plans were reasonable and necessary. Adjudicator Norris noted that with his...

September 17, 2020

/

tgp-admin

S.M. v Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company (18-008474)

The insurer and claimant sought reconsideration of Adjudicator Johal's decision that: (1) the claimant was only entitled to 120 minutes of ACBs per day and 60 minutes of ACBs per week, and (2) the claimant was not entitled to retroactive ACBs. Adjudicator Johal dismissed the reconsideration and noted that she properly applied the law to...

September 17, 2020

/

tgp-admin

Aquino v Aviva Insurance Company (19-006577)

A minor claimant applied to the LAT disputing entitlement to medical benefits and the cost of an examination. The insurer argued that the claimant was statute-barred, as the claimant filed her LAT dispute more than 2 years after the denials of benefits. The claimant argued that as she was a minor, she was not statute-barred...

September 17, 2020

/

tgp-admin

S.M. v. Mutual Insurance Company (18-008474)

The claimant sought reconsideration of the LAT's denial of retroactive ACBs and the decision regarding the amount of ACBs that were found payable. The accident occurred prior to September 1, 2010. Interpretation of the transitional provisions in the 2010 SABS and 1996 SABS was an issue in dispute, including interpretation of provisions relating to interest...

Contact Us

150 York Street, Suite 1800
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5

416.507.1850

eodonnell@tgplawyers.com

Contact Us

150 York Street, Suite 1800
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5

416.507.1850

eodonnell@tgplawyers.com

© 2020 Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Statement of Principles

Powered by Crow & Pitcher

Contact Us

150 York Street, Suite 1800
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5

416.507.1850

eodonnell@tgplawyers.com