The claimant disputed entitlement to non-earner benefits, medical assessments, and psychological services. The Tribunal found that the claimant did not meet the requirements for NEBs, as he failed to demonstrate a complete inability to carry on a normal life due to the accident. Despite medical evidence of ongoing impairments, the claimant did not establish the extent to which his pre-accident activities were affected. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the claimant was statute-barred from pursuing reimbursement for a neurological assessment due to falling outside the two-year limitation period.
Menu