The claimant appealed the Tribunal’s decision dismissing his claim for attendant care benefits on the grounds that his family members did not sustain an economic loss. The claimant argued that the Tribunal acted unfairly in requiring him to prove an economic loss, particularly given that he could not afford to hire a support worker. The Court dismissed the appeal, concluding that the Tribunal correctly applied the terms of the SABS, and that Tribunal could not ignore the requirement to prove an economic loss by a non-professional service provider.
