The claimant appealed the Tribunal’s decision that her MIG dispute was res judicata because she had already made an earlier LAT application disputing the MIG and medical benefits that was dismissed. The Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Tribunal acted reasonably in concluding that res judicata barred the claimant’s application. The information relied upon by the claimant had been available at the time of the original hearing, and was not new evidence that would have altered the original decision.
