LAT Case Law Summaries

Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP is pleased to provide this online resource to our clients. Below is a searchable database of the publicly released decisions from the Licence Appeal Tribunal. Assembled by the accident benefits group, the decisions are reviewed, briefly summarized, and categorized for easy access.

As of March 2020, we will not include any further decisions focused solely on the Minor Injury Guideline or treatment plans, unless the case may have broader applicability.

January 13, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Hordo v CAA Insurance Company (20-012761/AABS0

The claimants were involved in an accident. They filed an application, and the LAT found that they were not entitled to non-earner benefits, housekeeping/home maintenance benefits, interest, a special award, or costs. The claimants filed for reconsideration. Their request for reconsideration was denied. Vice-Chair Moore did not find a violation of procedural fairness, as the...

January 13, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Stoppard v. Economical Insurance, (21-006374/AABS-PI)

The claimant was involved in an accident. She incurred transportation expenses in relation to her hip replacement surgery, and submitted these expenses to her insurer. The insurer denied payment of the transportation expenses as the records did not support that the surgery was required as a result of the accident. The claimant submitted an additional...

January 13, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Delena v. Aviva Insurance Company (19-007957/AABS)

The claimant filed an Application disputing entitlement to NEBs, interest and sought costs under Rule 19. The claimant relied on limited medical evidence, including some diagnostic reports, an OT functional assessment, and doctors' records. The claimant argued that his accident-related injuries resulted in a complete inability to carry on a normal life. The insurer argued...

January 13, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Steele v. Aviva General Insurance (21-007268/AABS)

The claimant filed a LAT Application disputing entitlement to NEBs, interest, and a special award. The claimant testified that although she was able to do things, she was not able to totally engage in all of her pre-accident activities due to pain. For example, the claimant noted that she had "some" limitations with respect to...

January 13, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Intact Insurance Company v. Hashemi (20-011873)

The insurer applied to the LAT seeking repayment of benefits after concluding that the claimant was involved in a staged accident. The insurer sought repayment of accident benefits, examination costs, and other expenses (including EUO expenses and engineering expert expenses). Adjudicator Kepman accepted that the claimant made wilful material misrepresentations regarding the accident. However, only...

January 12, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Russell v. Dumfries Mutual Insurance Company (20-004264/AABS)

The claimant applied to the LAT for a CAT designation, ACBs, and medication. The adjudicator found that the claimant did have a CAT impairment under Category 8 and was entitled to receive ACBs and medication. The Tribunal rejected the insurer's argument that the pre-accident family death was the cause of the claimant's psychological impairment. The...

January 12, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Ding v. Wawanesa Insurance (20-008236/AABS)

The LAT was asked to determine whether the claimant was entitled to IRBs in the amount of $400 per week. The claimant relied on the submission of medical evidence to demonstrate that he suffered a substantial inability to perform the essential tasks of his self-employment as a result of the accident. The claimant also argued...

January 11, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Nassan v. Intact Insurance Company (20-010691/AABS)

The claimant applied to the LAT disputing his CAT denial under Criterion 8. The Tribunal held that the claimant did not sustain a CAT impairment under the SABS. The claimants had an unfortunate series of prior events before the MVA including being subject to torture and having to flee to Canada. The adjudicator determined that...

January 10, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Zhang v. Aviva Insurance Company (21-004454/AABS)

The claimant was denied benefits for non-compliance with s. 44 of the SABS after failing to attend psychological and physical insurer’s examinations . The claimant appealed to the LAT and was found statute-barred based on the two-year limitation period and non-compliance with s. 44. The limitation period was paused under O.Reg 73/20 due to COVID-19....

January 9, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Liu v. Certas Direct Insurance Company (20-012975/AABS)

The claimant disputed entitlement to NEBs, several treatment plans, and whether her injuries fell under the MIG. Adjudicator Maedel found that the claimant's injuries fell outside of the MIG due to psychological impairments. Despite the insurer's arguments that the claimant's psychological report was based entirely on subjective reporting and not on contemporaneous medical records, Adjudicator...

January 9, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Smith v. Intact Insurance, (21-005342/AABS – PI)

The claimant submitted an application for determination of catastrophic impairment. The insurer scheduled two IEs (psychological and occupational therapy), which the claimant attended. However, Dr. Kiss (psychologist) passed away before he could complete his report, and the insurer determined that the claimant had not meaningfully participated in the situational portion of the OT IE. The...

January 9, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Bennett v. The Co-operators (20-014453/AABS)

The claimant filed a LAT Application disputing several OCF-18s with interest. A special award was also claimed. The claimant argued that her worsening pre-accident fibromyalgia had resulted in numerous falls prior to the accident which required physical treatment. The main issue was payment of an OCF-18 for an attendant care assessment. The assessment had been...

January 9, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Katsiashvili v. Economical Mutual Insurance (21-015596)

The insurer argued that the claimant was not involved in a legitimate accident, pointing to inconsistencies is the material facts leading up to the accident, the description of the accident, and the injuries sustained. Adjudicator Kaur rejected the insurer's position, holding that the inconsistencies were minor, or were immaterial, or were not in fact inconsistencies...

January 9, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Elkhidir v. Intact Insurance Company (20-011803/AABS)

The claimant was injured in a motor vehicle accident and applied to the LAT for IRBs. Section 36(2) of the Schedule mandates that an applicant seeking IRBs shall submit a completed OCF-3 with their application for benefits, and that there can be no entitlement to IRBs for any period before the OCF-3 is submitted. A...

January 9, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Chen v. The Co-operators (20-012408/AABS)

The claimant applied to the LAT seeking entitlement to various benefits, including the ongoing payment of IRBs. The insurer denied IRBs on the basis that the claimant had provided insufficient medical evidence to prove that she suffered a substantial inability to perform the essential tasks of her employment as a manicurist. The claimant's productions lacked...

January 5, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Berardinelli v. Aviva Insurance Company, (21-007728/AABS)

The insurer requested that the claimant attend insurer examinations (IE) to assess her claims for various benefits. The claimant only attended one IE, and the insurer sought to bar the claimant’s application for attendant care, non-earner benefits, and treatment plans for her failure to attend IEs. The insurer sent 4 notices of examination to assess...

January 5, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Gray v. Intact Insurance (21-008634)

This is a preliminary issue decision. The claimant applied for accident benefits following an incident in August 2019. The applicant was in her home when a vehicle struck a house a few doors down. A large natural gas explosion occurred at the impacted house. The claimant alleged she sustained psychological impairments as a result of...

January 4, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Del Grosso v. Intact Insurance Company (20-013318)

The claimant was involved in an accident in Michigan and elected to receive Michigan no-fault benefits, including Work Loss Benefits (the Michigan equivalent of IRBs). The insurer later learned that the claimant misrepresented his driving history and insurance history when applying for his auto policy. The insurer terminated the claimant's entitlement to Work Loss Benefits...

January 4, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Howes v, CAA Insurance Company (21-012279)

This is a preliminary issue decision. The claimant applied for accident benefits following an incident in February 2019. She was asleep at home when a truck drove into her house, destroying her dining room and kitchen. She alleged that she was injured when a large mirror fell down on her as a result of the...

January 3, 2023

/

tgp-admin

Madore v. Intact Insurance Company (2023 ONSC 11)

The claimant appealed the Tribunal's decision that he was not involved in an "accident" as defined in the SABS. The claimant had been inspecting and cleaning the roof of his camper trailer, which was hitched to his pickup truck. In the course of cleaning the trailer, the claimant fell to the ground, suffering serious injuries...

December 29, 2022

/

tgp-admin

Nagalingam v. Economical Insurance Company (20-006884)

The claimant sought entitlement to pre-104 week and post-104 week IRBs. The insurer denied the claimant's entitlement and argued that section 33 barred the claim as the claimant failed to provide information relating to his place of residence, which was relevant to a potential section 31 exclusion. Adjudicator Maleki-Yazdi found that the claimant did not...

Contact Us

150 York Street, Suite 1800
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5

416.507.1850

eodonnell@tgplawyers.com

© 2020 Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Statement of Principles

Powered by Crow & Pitcher

Subscribe to get TGP’s case summaries straight to your inbox

Subscribe to get TGP’s case summaries straight to your inbox

Contact Us

150 York Street, Suite 1800
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5

416.507.1850

eodonnell@tgplawyers.com

© 2020 Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP